Question Bank for the Level II CFA Exam-
If you ask most CFA charterholders, they will tell you there is only one way to passing the level II CFA exam: practice, practice… and practice like it’s the real exam. This is why AnalystPrep’s method of teaching is better than other preparation materials out there: AnalystPrep provides you with what you will be seeing in your level II exam – item sets. Each item set is made up of a case statement (usually 800-1000 words long) and 6 multiple choice questions with detailed answers.
Level II CFA Exam Item Sets-
The Level II CFA exam is often regarded as the most difficult from all of the three CFA exams, and the team at AnalystPrep believes non-item set practice questions are basically useless. You want to practice on what you will be tested on when comes exam time! As such, CFA charterholders at AnalystPrep have designed 200 vignette-style item sets, which represent over 1000 practice questions to better prepare each candidate for its level II exam.
How to Get Started?
All item sets from AnalystPrep’s Level II CFA Exam QBank are organized by chapter and cover most of the important concepts that have been tested in past level II CFA exams. Plus you can do an unlimited amount of personalized quizzes that target specific areas of the curriculum. Simply register a free account to test out 10 item sets (60 free questions) and see why AnalystPrep will help you pass the level II CFA exam!
Example Item Set from AnalystPrep's Question Bank
Smart Coffee Growers, SCG, is a U.S. based society specializing in coffee processing and value addition. In line with its recently approved policy that prioritizes diversification, the society is contemplating an investment in 2 local companies: A chocolate manufacturer – Yummy Bars, and a small scale groundnut company – Natural Nuts Ltd. SCG’s management would like to finalize investment decisions regarding the two entities by January 1 2017.
SCG wants a 30% stake in Yummy Bars, and the management feels the level of control acquired will be sufficient to allow SCG to be represented in the board. That means the society will be able to participate in decision making and policy making processes. As such, the society is willing to offer $180 million in cash. Now, the book values of Yummy Bar’s assets and liabilities equal their values, with the exception of a manufacturing plant. Just before the acquisition, the plant has a book value of $24 million, a fair value of $45 million, and a useful life of 10 years. The exhibit below provides pre-investment balance sheets and income statements of the two entities.
SCG and Yummy Bars Pre-Acquisition Balance Sheets and Income Statements
SCG ($ 000) |
Yummy Bars ($ 000) |
|
Income Statement | ||
Sales | 1,200,000 | 750,000 |
Cost of Sales | (675,000) | (300,000) |
Other Expenses | (135,000) | (60,0000) |
Net Income | 390,000 | 390,000 |
Balance Sheet | ||
Cash | 105,000 | 45,000 |
Inventory | 330,000 | 255,000 |
Accounts Receivable | 165,000 | 120,000 |
Other assets | 45,000 | 30,000 |
Total Assets | 645,000 | 450,000 |
Accounts Payable | 225,000 | 180,000 |
Long-Term Debt | 15,000 | 6,000 |
Shareholders’ Equity | 240,000 | 180,000 |
Retained Earnings | 165,000 | 84,000 |
Total Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity | 645,000 | 450,000 |
SCG plans to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of Natural Nuts Ltd. The society will achieve this by issuing 6 million of its own equity that has $1 par value and $30 million current market value. Exhibit 2 below provides pre-acquisition balance sheet information for Natural Nuts Ltd using book values and fair values. The shareholders’ equity figure included in SCG’s pre-acquisition balance sheet (exhibit 1) includes $90 million additional paid in capital with the remainder attributable to $1 par value common stock.
Natural Nut Ltd.’s Pre-Acquisition Balance Sheet using Book Values and Fair Values
Book Value ($ 000) |
Fair Value ($ 000) |
|
Cash | 12,000 | 12,000 |
Inventory | 7,500 | 10,500 |
Accounts Receivable | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Other Assets | 24,000 | 31,500 |
Total Assets | 45,000 | 55,500 |
Accounts Payable | 6,000 | 6,000 |
Long-Term Debt | 15,000 | 21,000 |
21,000 | 27,000 | |
66,000 | 82,500 | |
Shareholder’s Equity | ||
Common Stock ($1 par) | 40,500 | |
Additional Paid-in Capital | 18,000 | |
Retained Earnings | 13,500 |
One year following the investment in Natural Nuts Ltd., the carrying value of its steel conversion unit is $4,500,000, while the fair value is $3,750,000. An in-house analyst estimates the the fair value of its identifiable net assets to be worth $3,540,000. The steel conversion unit is an independent reporting unit.
Practice Questions
Question 1/6
What’s the amount of goodwill reported on Fisher SCG’s balance sheet immediately following the purchase of Yummy Bars?
A. $0.
B. $45 million.
C. $94 million.
The correct answer is A.
Since the investment in Yummy Bars will provide SCG with board representation in addition to the ability to participate in policy decision-making matters, SCG will have significant influence over the target. Thus, the investment in Yummy Bars should be accounted for via the equity method of accounting.
Under the equity method of accounting, goodwill is not reported separately in the acquirer’s balance sheet. Rather, it’s incorporated as part of the cost of investment. As such, the amount of goodwill to be reported in the balance sheet is $0.
Study Session 5, Reading 16, LOS 16(C): analyze how different methods used to account for intercorporate investments affect financial statements and ratios
Question 2/6
Suppose SCG offered $50 million for the acquisition of Yummy Bars. SCG would most likely:
A. Subject itself to post-acquisition legal suits from Yummy Bars.
B. Recognize the difference between the fair value of Yummy Bars’ assets and the purchase price as a gain in profit and loss.
C. Recognize the difference between the fair value of Yummy Bars’ assets and the purchase price as a loss in profit and loss
The correct answer is B.
$50 million would be considerably less than the fair value of Yummy Bars’ net assets. As such, that would effectively make the acquisition a bargain acquisition. Under both IFRS and US GAAP, SCG would be required to recognize the difference between the fair value of Yummy Bars’ assets and the purchase price as a gain in profit and loss.
Study session 5, Reading 16, LOS 16(b): distinguish between IFRS and US GAAP in the classification, measurement, and disclosure of investments in financial assets, investments in associates, joint ventures, business combinations, and special purpose and variable interest entities
Question 3/6
Suppose SCG acquired just 18% of Yummy Bars. Would the society have significant influence over the associate?
A. No, significant influence can only be exercised with a minimum of 30% of voting rights
B. Yes, provided SCG holds at least 50% of board positions
C. Yes, provided SCG is represented in the board
The correct answer is C.
Influence can be exercised with a 20%-50% of voting power. If an investor holds less than 20% of the voting rights, they cannot exert influence unless the such influence can be demonstrated. With 18% of voting power, SCG would be able to exert influence if and only if:
- It has representatives in the board of directors
- It can participate in policy formulation
- It is capable of pulling of material transactions between itself and Yummy Bars
- There’s interchange of managerial personnel
- There’s technological dependency
Study session 5, Reading 16, LOS 16(a): describe the classification, measurement, and disclosure under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for 1) investments in financial assets, 2) investments in associates, 3) joint ventures, 4) business combinations, and 5) special purpose and variable interest entities
Question 4/6
A year into SCG’s investment in Yummy bars, SCG sold $7.5m of inventory to Yummy Bars for $12m. Yummy resold $8m of this inventory during the year. What was SCG’s share of the unrealized profit?
A. $4.5m
B. $1.4985m
C. $0.44955m
The correct answer is C.
SCG’s profit from the sale = $12 – $7.5 = $4.5m
Yummy Bars sells 8/12 = 66.7% of the goods purchased from SCG.
That means 33.3% remains unsold.
Total unrealized profit = 33.3% × $4.5m = $1.4985m
SCG’s share of the unrealized profit = 30% × $1.4985 = $0.44955m
Study session 5, Reading 16, LOS 16(b): distinguish between IFRS and US GAAP in the classification, measurement, and disclosure of investments in financial assets, investments in associates, joint ventures, business combinations, and special purpose and variable interest entities
Question 5/6
If the acquisition method of accounting is used for the combination between SCG and Natural Nuts Ltd:
A. SCG will measure the identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of Natural Nuts Ltd at fair value
B. SCG must not recognize any assets and liabilities that were previously recognized by Natural Nuts Ltd, including patents and brand names
C. Costs that SCG expects (but not obliged) to incur must be recognized as liabilities as of the acquisition date
The correct answer is A.
The acquisition method replaces the purchase method of accounting. Under the new method, all identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquiree (Natural Nuts Ltd.) must be measured at fair (market) value.
Option B is incorrect: SCG would be expected to recognize any assets or liabilities that were previously not recognized by the Natural Nuts Ltd.
Option C is incorrect: SCG would be expected to recognize any contingent liability assumed in the acquisition provided it can be measured reliably and it’s a present obligation rooted in past events. However, costs that SCG expects but which are not an obligation would not be recognized as liabilities as of the acquisition date.
Study Session 5, Reading 16, LOS 16(C): analyze how different methods used to account for intercorporate investments affect financial statements and ratios
Question 6/6
Assuming that one year following the investment in Natural Nuts, the carrying value of goodwill for the steel conversion unit is $600,000. The impairment loss on the unit would be closest to:
A. $0.39m
B. $0.60m
C. $0.21m
The correct answer is A.
The carrying amount of the unit (including goodwill) is higher ($4.5m) than its fair value ($3.75m). This implies that there has been impairment.
Fair market value of the unit | $3.75m |
Net assets | ($3.54m) |
Implied goodwill | $0.21m |
Current carrying value of goodwill | $0.6m |
Less implied goodwill | ($0.21m) |
Implied loss | $0.39m |